Sec 48 & 49 Chapter V (Valuation of Suits.)The Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961

1 [48. Suits not otherwise provided for. -

(1) In a suit as to whose] value for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction of Courts, specific provision is not otherwise made in this Act or in any other law, value for that purpose and value for the purpose of computing the fee payable under this Act shall be the same.

(2) In a suit where fee is payable under this Act at a fixed rate, the value for the purpose of determining the jurisdiction of Courts shall be the market value or where it is not possible to estimate it at a money value such amount as the plaintiff shall state in the plaint.

1 Substituted vide section 2 of Rajasthan Act No. 3 of 1962, published in Rajasthan Gazette Part IV-A, Extraordinary, dated 20-4-1962.

49. Procedure where objection is taken on appeal or revision that a suit or appeal was not properly valued for jurisdictional purposes.-

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Central Act 5 of 1908), an objection that by reason of the over-valuation or under valuation of a suit or appeal, a Court of first instance or lower appellate Court which had no jurisdiction with respect to the suit or appeal exercised jurisdiction with respect thereto shall not be entertained by an appellate Court, unless-

(a) the objection was taken in the Court of first instance at or before the hearing at which issues were first framed and recorded, or in the lower appellate Court in the memorandum of appeal to that Court, or

(b) the appellate Court is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded by it in writing, that the suit or appeal was over-valued or under-valued and that the over valuation or under valuation thereof has prejudicially affected the disposal of the suit or appeal on its merits.

Also Check: The Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act Free One Liners Notes

(2) If the objection was taken in the manner mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (1), but the appellate court is not satisfied as to both the matters mentioned in clause (b) of that sub- section and has before it the materials necessary for the determination of the other grounds of appeal to itself, it shall dispose of the appeal as if there had been no defect of jurisdiction in the Court of the first instance or lower appellate court.

(3) If the objection was taken in that manner and the appellate Court is satisfied as to both those matters and has not those materials before it, it shall proceed to deal with the appeal under the rules applicable to the Court with respect to the hearing of appeal; but if it remands the suit or appeal or frames and refers issues for trial, or requires additional evidence to be taken, it shall direct its order to a Court competent to entertain the suit or appeal.

(4) The provisions of this section with respect to an appellate Court shall, so far as they can be made applicable, apply to a Court exercising revisional jurisdiction under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Central Act 5 of 1908), or other enactment for the time being in force.

Important Links:

Free Judiciary Classes ♦ Free One Liner Notes ♦ Free Detailed Notes ♦ Free Mock Tests ♦ Judiciary Syllabus ♦ Judiciary PYQ’s ♦ Free MCQs ♦ Bare Acts